Theater News Online
free issue
London Theatre Reviews
NY Theater Reviews
LTN Recommendations
NYTN Recommendations
Book Reviews
Movie Reviews
London Theatre Archives
NY Theater Archives
Latest New York News
Latest London News
NY News Archives
London News Archives
Peter Filichia's Monday Quiz
Dining and Travel
London Theatre Listings
NY Broadway Listings
Off-Broadway Listings
London Tickets
Advertise with us

Subscribe
Renew
Give a Gift


Logo

Adagio Teas
   Features  >  NY Theater Reviews

 
WHO’S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF?
at the Booth

LASTING TENSION
By BERNARD CARRAGHER

  Madison Dirks, Tracy Letts and Amy Morton/ Ph: Michael Brosilow

George and Martha are back. Edward Albee’s iconic couple with no last names, who do battle royal in his landmark play Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? are being feted with a 50th anniversary production by Chicago’s Steppenwolf Theater, currently playing at Broadway’s Booth Theatre on West 45th Street through Feb. 24.
 
Over the years, Albee’s play has lost little of its initial dramatic power or its harsh comedy, with only its language tending to be less shocking than when it debuted a half century ago. The play’s essential vehemence still rages and roars across the stage with hurricane ferocity, yet in the end, Virginia Woolf is also wise and understanding and ultimately compassionate.
 
Albee begins his play at 2:00 in the morning in the book-cluttered living room of George (Tracy Letts) and Martha (Amy Morton), bringing them home from a party where they have been drinking steadily. George, who is 46, and Martha 52, have been married for 22 years. As a professor of history in a small New England college where Martha’s father is president, George has not exactly achieved academic distinction, and Martha is not letting him forget it. She taunts, jeers and baits him, and the presence of her startled guests Nick (Madison Dirks), a young biology instructor, and Honey (Carrie Coon), his mousey bride, does not deter her. As the night proceeds with all four of them drinking steadily, Martha increases the tempo of her attacks on George. He warns her, threatens her, while she just howls down his protests until he reaches a breaking point and sets out to retaliate with diabolical fury.
 
Earlier Martha had mentioned their 21-year-old son. George reminds her of some agreement they have between them not to mention the boy. She scoffs off his objections, but in a staggering scene while she talks on about the boy George stands over her reading a death service, shouting Martha down with the news that their son is dead. Only then does the truth begin to appear. George and Martha could never have a child, and this is a reason for the long-awful bitterness of their marriage. Virginia Woolf ends with the unmasking of this illusion that George and Martha have lied to themselves about for years.
 
With any production of Virginia Woolf, the most crucial element is the delicate balance of casting George and Martha. It determines who the audience sides with during the play and how Albee’s denouement plays out. Though I didn’t see the original Broadway production, the reviews indicate that Uta Hagen and Arthur Hill were evenly matched. Mike Nichols’ 1966 film version starring Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton also achieved a level battleground between the warring couple, as did the Albee-directed 1976 revival that featured Colleen Dewhurst and Ben Gazzara. A 2005 Kathleen Turner star-driven staging became Martha’s play, with an ancillary George played by Bill Irwin. Here, under the careful direction of Pam MacKinnon, we have a talented quartet of Chicago-based actors playing the strafing duo and their late-night visitors.
 
Yet this new Virginia Woolf tends to lean in favor of George – played with brilliant nuance by Letts – who quietly dominates the evening’s proceedings. Letts' name may sound familiar since besides being a fine actor he is also the author of the Pulitzer Prize-wining play August: Osage County. From a slow-burn start, Letts builds his performance as George, scene by scene, act by act, to an explosive photo finish in the play’s final moments. Morton is hardly a slouch and gives as good as she gets in a solid performance as the brawling and badgering harridan Martha, though her interpretation of the character tends to become more yielding as the evening proceeds. But no one escapes getting targeted in this night of marital combat. Halfway through the proceedings George introduces a nasty party game – Get the Guests – in which he excoriates their young visitors, pinning Nick down as a slick adventurer and Honey as a fraud who tricked him into marriage.
 
When Virginia Woolf opened on Broadway in 1962, Albee was only known for a handful of one-act plays, one of which, The Zoo Story, indicated he was an artist with a rare insight into suffering and human nature. He was tagged by the theater cognoscente of the time as a young playwright to keep an eye on. But with the arrival of the stunning Virginia Woolf, his previous one-act successes proved to be only preliminary works. He then emerged as a mature dramatist of first ranking. At 34, Albee found himself being hailed as the first American dramatist of stature to appear since Tennessee Williams and Arthur Miller. One critic even suggested that Albee, in this his first long play, proved he knew more about playwriting than Eugene O’Neill did at the beginning of his career.
 
When Albee wrote Virginia Woolf there had been very few American plays to match the brutally candid presentation of love and hatred in matrimony, which is what his play is all about. The idea that men and women who love deeply may very well hate and hurt one another at the very same time was comparatively new in theater. It was first expressed by the Swedish dramatist August Strindberg in his 1901 drama Dance of Death. Strindberg wrote of a husband and wife, very much like George and Martha, waging a terrible marital war driven by an inner force he called “love-hate.”
 
Eugene O’Neill was the first American to recognize Strindberg’s power and understanding and made “love-hate” the central fact of many of his best plays, including Long Day’s Journey into Night, which he wrote in an attempt to understand why his family, the O’Neill’s, loved so deeply but also hated and hurt one another. Arthur Miller was also concerned with love-hatred of fathers and sons in All My Sons, and again in Death of a Salesman. Tennessee Williams explored the same puzzling topic in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof.
 
Now after five decades, Albee’s masterwork of love-hate and retribution is being introduced to a new generation of theatergoers and still proves to be furiously and endlessly alive, and one of the most mesmerizing dramas of our time. For its three acts and three-hour duration, you could hear a pin drop in the Booth Theatre.

 


SUBSCRIBE TO New York Theater News
SUBSCRIBE TO London Theater News

SCHEDULE UPDATES -
Yes, Prime Minister contracts its run, while A Chorus Line expands its own.
POWERHOUSE OF THEATRE - After 11 years as the Almeida Theatre's artistic director, Michael Attenborough is stepping down to focus on directing. 

SONGS FROM THE HEART - Once the Tony-Award winning musical is set to hit London in January.


Wine, Fruit, and Gourmet Gift Baskets.
Privacy Notice   |   Front Page
Copyright © TheaterNewsOnline.com. All Rights Reserved.